| Resumen: | Se estudian tres alternativas de tratamiento quirúrgico de la Colecistitis Aguda, el Grupo I de 40 pacientes estudiados en forma retrospectiva, recibieron tratamiento médico conservador y cirugía convencional diferida; el Grupo II de 40 pacientesestudiados en forma prospectiva y operados antes de las 72 horas de iniciado el cuadro vesicular agudo mediante técnica convencional y el Grupo III de 40 pacientes estudiados en forma prospectiva e intervenidos mediante técnica laparoscópica. Comparamos el tiempo operatorio, la caída de temperatura, el retiro de sondanasogástrica, el dolor postoperatorio, la tolerancia oral y el tiempo de hospitalización postoperatorio. Demostramos que hay una diferencia significativa en todos los parámetros antes mencionados sobre todo cuando comparamos la técnica convencional y la técnica laparoscópica, en favor de la última. (AU)^iesThree alternatives of surgical treatment tor acute cholescystitis were studied. The 40 patients integrating Group I were studied in a retrospective way and received conservative medical treatment and deterred conventional surgery. The 40 patients integrating Group II were studied in a prospective way and they were operated according to conventiónal technique 72 hours before the beginning of the acutevesicular condition. The 40 patients integrating Group III were studied in a prospective way and they were operated using laparoscopic technique.The operation time, fall of temperature, the removal of the nasogastric tube, thepostoperative pain, the oral tolerance and the postoperative hospitalization time were compared. We find out that there is a significant difference between all the aforementioned parameters and, particularly, between the conventional technique and the laparoscopic technique. (AU)^ien.
|
